Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39685478›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Redifferentiation Therapies in Thyroid Oncology: Molecular and Clinical Aspects.

Petra Petranović Ovčariček, Murat Tuncel, Atena Aghaee, Alfredo Campennì, Luca Giovanella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra Petranović OvčaričekDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1946-2128
Murat TuncelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06230 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2352-3587
Atena AghaeeNuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948564, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1351-3142
Alfredo CampennìUnit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-939X
Luca GiovanellaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Gruppo Ospedaliero Moncucco, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1940s, 131-I radioiodine therapy (RIT) has been the primary treatment for metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Approximately half of these patients respond favorably to RIT, achieving partial or complete remission or maintaining long-term stable disease, while the other half develop radioiodine-refractory DTC (RAI-R DTC). The main genomic alteration involved in radioiodine resistance is the activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which results in the loss of sodium iodide symporters (NIS). Therefore, RAI-R DTC requires alternative treatment options such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Over the past decade, several studies have investigated pharmacological induction or enhancement of NIS expression through "redifferentiation" therapies, mainly targeting the MAPK pathway. These novel approaches can restore radioiodine sensitivity in previously refractory patients and, therefore, potentially reestablish the efficacy of RIT. This review discusses various redifferentiation strategies, including their molecular mechanisms and clinical implications.

Indexed as

BRAFdifferentiated thyroid cancerMEKNTRKradioactive iodine refractoryredifferentiationRETtyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39685478
PMCPMC11642198

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.