Does Endometrial Thickness or Compaction Impact the Success of Frozen Embryo Transfer? A Cohort Study Analysis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A New Method of Assessing Endometrial Compaction as an Indicator of Endometrial Receptivity for Predicting Reproductive Success.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
   Article
2. NF-κB as an Inflammatory Biomarker in Thin Endometrium: Predictive Value for Live Birth in Recurrent Implantation Failure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
3. Association of WEE2 Gene Polymorphism with Fertilization Failure in Women Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.International journal of women's health · 2025
   Article
4. Development and Validation of a Combined Model Integrating Early Pregnancy Ultrasound Radiomics and Clinical Features to Predict Live Birth Following Single Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfer.Reproductive medicine and biology
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as