Evidence mapPaperPMID 39685790Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Challenges in Transitioning from Controlled to Assisted Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Management.

Denise Battaglini, Patricia R M Rocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Denise BattagliniDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6895-6442
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G-014, Ilha Do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro 21941-598, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-7136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents significant challenges in critical care, primarily due to its inflammatory nature, which leads to impaired gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. While mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential for patient support, the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation is complex and may be associated with intensive care unit-acquired weakness, ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and patient self-inflicted lung injury. This paper explores the multifaceted challenges encountered during this transition, with a focus on respiratory effort, sedation management, and monitoring techniques, and investigates innovative approaches to enhance patient outcomes. The key strategies include optimizing sedation protocols, employing advanced monitoring methods like esophageal pressure measurements, and implementing partial neuromuscular blockade to prevent excessive respiratory effort. We also emphasize the importance of personalized treatment plans and the integration of artificial intelligence to facilitate timely transitions. By highlighting early rehabilitation techniques, continuously assessing the respiratory drive, and fostering collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, clinicians can improve the transition from controlled to assisted MV, ultimately enhancing recovery and long-term respiratory health in patients with ARDS.

Indexed as

ARDSassisted ventilationcontrolled ventilationmechanical ventilationpressure support ventilationtransitioningweaning

Identifiers

PMID39685790
PMCPMC11642309

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.