Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686552›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2025

Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.

Logan A Gaudet, Lena Rybka, Emmanuel Mandonnet, Emmanuelle Volle, Marion Barberis, Roel Jonkers, Adrià Rofes

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Logan A GaudetCenter for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-4921-4840
Lena RybkaCenter for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emmanuel MandonnetFrontLab at Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle VolleFrontLab at Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Marion BarberisFrontLab at Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Roel JonkersCenter for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Adrià RofesCenter for Language and Cognition Groningen (CLCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-1734

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekRijksuniversiteit Groningen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding lexico-semantic processing is crucial for dissecting the complexities of language and its disorders. Relatedness-based measures, or those which investigate the degree of relatedness in meaning between either task items or items produced by participants, offer the opportunity to harness novel computational and analytical techniques from cognitive network science. Recognizing the need to deepen our understanding of lexico-semantic deficits through diverse experimental and analytical approaches, this review explores the use of such measures in research into language disorders. A comprehensive search of four electronic databases covering publications from the last 11 years (October 2013-September 2024) identified 38 original experimental studies employing relatedness-based measures in populations with language disorders or other neurological conditions. Articles were examined for the types of tasks used, populations studied, item selection methods and analytical approaches. The predominant use of category fluency tasks emerged across studies, with a notable absence of relatedness judgement tasks or comparable paradigms. Commonly discussed populations included individuals with post-stroke aphasia, mild cognitive impairment and schizophrenia. Analytical methods varied significantly, ranging from more traditional approaches of clustering and switching to more sophisticated computational techniques. Despite the evident utility of category fluency tasks in research and clinical settings, the review underscores a critical need to diversify experimental paradigms and probe lexico-semantic processing in a more multifaceted manner. A broadened approach in future language disorder research should incorporate innovative analytical techniques, investigations of neural correlates and a wider array of tasks employing relatedness-based measures already present in healthy populations.

Indexed as

Language DisordersSemanticsHumansNeuropsychological Testsrelatedness‐based measuresscoping reviewsemantic networkssemantic systemverbal fluency

Identifiers

PMID39686552
PMCPMC12166655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.