ReviewCardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry2025
Emerging Biomarkers for Assessing Thrombotic Risk in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs).
Review in Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the management of thrombotic disorders, offering a more convenient and effective alternative to traditional vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, assessing thrombotic risk in patients treated with DOACS remains crucial due to the potential for recurrent events. Current clinical risk scores have limitations in predicting and monitoring venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in specific DOAC populations. Several emerging biomarkers show promise in assessing thrombotic risk in patients treated with DOACS. Genetic factors like VKORC1 and CYP2C9 variants are well-established determinants of warfarin response, but the genetic landscape for DOAC outcomes appears more complex. Rare variants and polygenic approaches may play a role in personalizing anticoagulation therapy. Elevated factor VIII levels are associated with increased VTE recurrence risk after anticoagulation withdrawal in cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients. In contrast, the circulating tissue factor is not useful for predicting VTE in this setting. Soluble P-selectin has emerged as a good marker of VTE recurrence, and its inclusion in the Vienna CATS risk model improves VTE prediction in cancer patients. While these biomarkers hold promise, larger studies are needed to validate their utility and establish standardized assays. Caution is warranted in patients at high bleeding risk. Integrating clinical factors, genetics, and circulating biomarkers will likely optimize thrombotic risk assessment in patients treated with DOACS. Continued research is crucial to develop personalized anticoagulation strategies to balance thrombosis and bleeding risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39686633What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.