ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2024
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast and invasive breast carcinoma of no special type: a comparison of claudin proteins' expression and its impact on survival.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming growth factor-β and integrins: key players in EMT and breast cancer progression.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast is characterized by clusters of cells presenting with inverted polarity. Although the apico-basal polarity is a fundamental property of the epithelium, the biological alterations leading to the inside-out pattern observed in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) remain mostly unknown. The regulation of tight junctions in polarity formation and maintenance is acknowledged. By using immunohistochemistry, we have analysed claudin-1, -3, -4, and -7 tight junction proteins expression and their prognostic value on IMPCs and compared them to invasive breast carcinomas of no special type (IBC-NST) tumors. Our cohort consisted of 37 IMPCs, 36 IBC-NST and 9 mixed IMPC/IBC-NST tumors. Two scoring systems were used to quantify protein expression: a 4-tier scoring system and the H-score method. Distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) intervals and overal survival (OS) data were used for prognosis evaluation. The analysed samples were characterized mainly by low or no claudin-1 expression whereas claudins-3, -4 and -7 showed variable positivity. We have found no significant differences in claudin-3 and -4 protein expression between IMPC and IBC-NST groups with either scoring methods, however high claudin-7 expression was found in significantly more IMPCs than IBC-NST tumors according to the H-score system (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.