Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39687294›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Efficacy and safety of oral propranolol and topical timolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Xiaoye Huang, Wenyue Si, Zhili Zou, Binyao Li, Yide Mu, Wei Zhong, Kaiying Yang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Vulvar Hemangioma: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoye Huang *Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, National Children's Medical Center for South Central Region, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenyue Si *Department of Science Research and Education Management, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, National Children's Medical Center for South Central Region, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhili ZouThe First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Binyao LiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, National Children's Medical Center for South Central Region, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yide MuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, National Children's Medical Center for South Central Region, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei ZhongDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, National Children's Medical Center for South Central Region, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kaiying YangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, National Children's Medical Center for South Central Region, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Propranolol, a nonselective β-blocker, is the first-line treatment for infantile hemangioma (IH). Topical timolol has recently been proposed as a novel IH treatment with fewer adverse effects. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of oral propranolol and topical timolol for treating IH. Methods: Studies were included after searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library via the keywords of "propranolol", "timolol", "infantile hemangioma" and their synonyms. A meta-analysis with pooled odds ratios was performed using the fixed-effect model. Results: Seven articles with 2071 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with topical timolol, oral propranolol had a greater response rate (OR = 2.12, Conclusion: Oral propranolol presents superior therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of IH compared to topical timolol. However, topical timolol can serve as an alternative to oral propranolol for treating superficial IH, providing similar efficacy with fewer adverse effects. Additionally, propranolol at a dosage of 2 mg/kg/d offers greater efficacy with a comparable safety profile, whereas the 1.0∼1.5 mg/kg/d propranolol dosage shows no significant difference in efficacy compared to timolol but is associated with more adverse events. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024603724, identifier CRD42024603724.

Indexed as

efficacy and safetyinfantile hemangiomameta-analysispropranololtimolol

Identifiers

PMID39687294
PMCPMC11646719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.