ArticleCureus2024
Standardisation of Blood Pressure Measurement Among Patients Attending an Urban Primary Health Centre: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is essential for detecting, diagnosing, treating, and monitoring hypertensive individuals. This qualitative improvement initiative study is aimed at improving adherence to standardised BP measurement protocols in an urban primary health centre in Delhi, India. This study was conducted using a checklist based on World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. Baseline assessment revealed low adherence to standardised procedures. Interventions included crowd management, infrastructure and equipment, standard operating procedures (SOPs) development, and staff training. After two plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles conducted within six weeks, the adherence to standardised BP measurement significantly increased from 0.4% (n=1) to 86.2% (n=119). This study highlights the potential for targeted quality improvement in healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.