SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor for locally advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACRC). Method: Retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, all relevant studies about PD-1 inhibitors for neoadjuvant treatment of LACRC were collected from inception to 31 December 2023. The efficacy was assessed by the rate of pathological complete response (PCR), clinical complete response (CCR), and major pathological response (MPR), and the safety was evaluated by the incidence of all adverse effects (TRAEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted by experimental design, types of PD-1 inhibitors, and disease types. Result: A total of 803 patients were included in 21 studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the PCR rate of PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of LACRC was 54% (95% CI: 43%-65%, P<0.05); the CCR of anti-PD-1 was 40% (95% CI: 26%-54%, P<0.05); the MPR was 66% (95% CI: 56%-76%, P<0.05); and the irAEs was 27% (95% CI: 17%-37%, P<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that the PCRs in prospective studies and retrospective studies were 49% (95% CI: 32%-66%, P<0.05) and 57% (95% CI: 42%-73%, P<0.05), respectively. Among the 803 patients, 619 (77%) were diagnosed with rectal cancer (RC), and the PCR and MPR were 49% and 65%, respectively; 184 (23%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), and the PCR and MPR were both 67%. In our meta-analysis, types of PD-1 inhibitors, including sintilimab, toripalimab, camrelizumab, avelumab, pembrolizumab, and tislelizumab, and patients who received PD-1 inhibitors alone or in combination achieved good PCR rates. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant therapy combined with a PD-1 inhibitor has a favorable PCR and relatively low incidences of irAEs for patients with LACRC, suggesting that this regimen including a PD-1 inhibitor is significantly effective and sufficiently safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.