SynthesisHuman brain mapping2024
Mentalizing About Dynamic Social Action Sequences Is Supported by the Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Neocortex: A Meta-Analysis of Activation and Connectivity.
Synthesis in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-Scale Cerebellar-Cerebral Network Alterations Underlying Impaired Social Predictive Processing in Cerebellar Neurodegeneration.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Neural correlates of meditation-induced changes in self-related traits: a resting state fMRI study.Mindfulness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The posterior cerebellum and anterior basal ganglia are critical subcortical structures for learning and identifying dynamic action sequences, in concert with the neocortex. The present analysis investigates the role of action sequences during social mentalizing, termed here dynamic or sequential social mentalizing. Although the role of the cerebellum in dynamic social mentalizing was extensively investigated during the last decade, the basal ganglia were long ignored. We conducted an activation likelihood estimation coordinate-based meta-analysis of sequential social mentalizing tasks (with 485 participants in 17 studies). These tasks required participants to make social mentalizing inferences ranging from low-level goals to high-level beliefs and traits, while either memorizing, generating or predicting temporal sequences of the social actions involved (i.e., social sequencing condition), or not (i.e., social non-sequencing control condition), or did so for nonsocial objects (i.e., nonsocial sequencing control condition). The tasks also occasionally included inconsistencies in social behavior. Results revealed that the cerebellum exhibited a preference for social, sequencing, and inconsistent information, while the basal ganglia showed a preference for sequencing and inconsistency, without a general preference for social input. Meta-analytic connectivity analysis further showed evidence of coactivation between mentalizing areas of the cerebellum, basal ganglia and cerebral neocortex. The present work underscores the role of subcortical structures in social mentalizing about dynamic action sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.