Evidence mapPaperPMID 39688718Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026

Exploring Racial and Ethnic Differences in Utilization of Medications for Obesity Management in a Nationally Representative Survey.

Kimberly Narain, Christopher Scannell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kimberly NarainUCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services, Research (GIM/HSR), 1100 Glendon Ave., Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. KNarain@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-1728
Christopher ScannellUniversity of Southern California Schaeffer Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

UCLA LIFT-UP (Leveraging Institutional support For Talented, Upcoming Physicians and/or Scientists)U24DK132746 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2025 to 2025
$710k
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2025 to 2025
$560k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000046Los Angeles Area Health Services Research Training Program at UCLA 5T32HS000046-31NIA NIH HHS K08 AG068372NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK132746NIH/NIA K08AG068372-01NIH/NIDDK 1U24DK132746-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of obesity falls disproportionately on some racial and ethnic minority groups.

objectiveTo assess for racial and ethnic differences in the utilization of obesity-management medications among clinically eligible individuals.

designMedical Expenditure Panel Survey (2011-2016, 2018 and 2020) data and a cross-sectional study design was used to assess for racial and ethnic differences in obesity-management medication utilization. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the association of race and ethnicity with obesity-management medication utilization. Adjusted models controlled for demographics, socioeconomic status, obesity class, diabetes status, number of chronic conditions, insurance status, and geographic region.

participantsAdults with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was utilization of an FDA-approved medication for obesity-management during the study period. The primary independent predictor was race and ethnicity. Separate indicator variables were created for each racial and ethnic group (Non-Hispanic Asian, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White (reference group)). KEY

resultsIn adjusted analyses, Asian (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.77; P < 0.01), Black (aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.68; P < 0.001) and Hispanic individuals (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.98; P = 0.04) had significantly lower odds of utilizing obesity-management medications compared to White individuals.

conclusionsThe results of this study suggest that there are racial and ethnic disparities in the use of obesity-management medications.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoObesityObesity ManagementRacial GroupsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultAnti-Obesity AgentsDisparitiesEthnicityMedicationsObesityRace

Identifiers

PMID39688718
PMCPMC12170923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.