ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Finerenone for Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from Japanese Payer Perspective.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Other Novel Nephroprotective Drugs.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Pooled it
- Global Long-Term Cost Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Finerenone versus spironolactone in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: a target trial emulation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Implementation of Established Global Guidelines in the Management of CKD in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Asia.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionType 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Japan, and there is an increasing treatment need for first- and second-line care in these patients. The addition of finerenone to current treatment modalities lowers the risk of CKD progression and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD and T2D from the Japanese payer perspective. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness analysis of adding finerenone to standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone for the treatment of CKD in patients with T2D.
methodsThe FINE-CKD model validated to estimate the cost-effectiveness of finerenone uses the Markov model to simulate the disease pathway of patients over a lifetime horizon. The model was adapted to reflect the Japanese payer perspective and estimated incremental costs, utilities, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of the uncertainty of each parameter using a robust model.
resultsThe quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for finerenone and SoC were estimated at 9.39 and 9.25, respectively, with an incremental QALY for finerenone for SoC of 0.14. The total cost of finerenone was estimated at ¥ 8,912,601, at an incremental cost of ¥ 274,052, leading to an ICER of ¥ 1,959,516 per QALY gained compared with SoC alone.
conclusionFinerenone in conjunction with SoC is a more cost-effective treatment alternative to SoC alone for adult patients with CKD and T2D from a Japanese healthcare payer perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.