ArticlePloS one2024
Arm weight effects on dynamic walking stability in individuals with hemiparetic stroke.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of arm weights on dynamic stability during overground walking in individuals with hemiparetic stroke. Arm weights have been shown to improve mobility in stroke survivors, potentially at the cost of decreased dynamic stability and increased fall risk. Data from nine stroke survivors (8 males, 1 female; age: 58.0 ± 6.8 years) were assessed under four conditions: no weight, weight attached to the non-hemiparetic side, weight attached to the hemiparetic side, and bilateral weights. Each condition used 0.45 kg sandbags. Kinematic data were captured using an eight-camera motion system and analyzed to assess center of mass position and velocity relative to the base of support. Although repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant differences in stability across conditions, individual scatter plots revealed variable responses among participants. Some maintained or improved their stability, while others experienced decreases under specific conditions. These findings underscore the need for personalized approaches in rehabilitation planning, suggesting that integrating arm weights into rehabilitation protocols may not compromise dynamic stability for most stroke survivors. Further research with larger sample sizes and varied weights is essential to validate these findings and tailor the use of arm weights in stroke rehabilitation more effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.