ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2025
ItpCtrl-AI: End-to-end interpretable and controllable artificial intelligence by modeling radiologists' intentions.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which explainable AI methods in medical imaging are clinically impactful? A systematic literature review addressing the clinician's perspective.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable deep learning for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy diagnosis: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using Deep Learning in computer-aided diagnosis systems has been of great interest due to its impressive performance in the general domain and medical domain. However, a notable challenge is the lack of explainability of many advanced models, which poses risks in critical applications such as diagnosing findings in CXR. To address this problem, we propose ItpCtrl-AI, a novel end-to-end interpretable and controllable framework that mirrors the decision-making process of the radiologist. By emulating the eye gaze patterns of radiologists, our framework initially determines the focal areas and assesses the significance of each pixel within those regions. As a result, the model generates an attention heatmap representing radiologists' attention, which is then used to extract attended visual information to diagnose the findings. By allowing the directional input, our framework is controllable by the user. Furthermore, by displaying the eye gaze heatmap which guides the diagnostic conclusion, the underlying rationale behind the model's decision is revealed, thereby making it interpretable. In addition to developing an interpretable and controllable framework, our work includes the creation of a dataset, named Diagnosed-Gaze++, which aligns medical findings with eye gaze data. Our extensive experimentation validates the effectiveness of our approach in generating accurate attention heatmaps and diagnoses. The experimental results show that our model not only accurately identifies medical findings but also precisely produces the eye gaze attention of radiologists. The dataset, models, and source code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.