Evidence mapPaperPMID 39690198Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Ulcers and diabetic foot : Modern and alternative treatment strategies].

Andrei Tanasov, Lawrence Chukwudi Nwabudike, George-Sorin Tiplica

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrei TanasovColentina Klinik, Dermatologie 2, "Carol Davila" Universität für Medizin und Pharmazie, Bukarest, Rumänien.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7769-3234
Lawrence Chukwudi NwabudikeN. Paulescu Nationales Diabetes Institut, Bukarest, Rumänien. Chukwudi.nwabudike@live.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-7396
George-Sorin TiplicaColentina Klinik, Dermatologie 2, "Carol Davila" Universität für Medizin und Pharmazie, Bukarest, Rumänien.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8719-6952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of diabetic foot is challenging due to the complex pathophysiological mechanisms, various clinical manifestations, severe complications with considerable impairment of quality of life, and the need for special, individualized treatment strategies. Particularly in the case of diabetic foot ulcers, conventional therapies are not always effective, so new treatment strategies are needed. This review aims to present alternative therapies with current efficacy data for diabetic foot ulcers that may be suitable for treatment-refractory ulcers. Platelet-rich plasma and stem cells have regenerative and anti-inflammatory effects and show good results in the treatment of diabetic ulcers, while ozone therapy improves local circulation and antioxidant levels. Wearable devices could become crucial for the long-term monitoring of patients with diabetic foot as they allow early identification of ulcers or infections. There are also literature reports of alternative treatments (e.g., maggot debridement, honey dressings, acupuncture) that have been used successfully for treatment-refractory ulcers, demonstrating how diverse the management of the diabetic foot can be.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootAcupuncture TherapyBandagesComplementary TherapiesDebridementHoneyHumansOzonePlatelet-Rich PlasmaOzoneAcupunctureOzone therapyPlatelet-rich plasmaStem cellsWound healing

Identifiers

PMID39690198
PMCPMC11711874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.