ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2024
Lack of Association between BDNF rs6265 and Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesData on the association between BDNF rs6265 and multiple sclerosis (MS) are scarce and heterogeneous. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe undertook a case-control study design. Newly diagnosed individuals with MS based on the 2017 revision of the McDonald criteria were recruited from the Neurology Department of the General University Hospital of Larissa. Healthy controls with a free medical and family history were also recruited. The relationship between BDNF rs6265 and MS was defined as the primary outcome. The association between rs6265 and age of MS onset, spinal lesions, and clinical manifestations at the time of MS onset were defined as the secondary outcomes.
resultsWe genotyped a total of 200 patients with MS and 205 healthy controls, yielding a sample power of approximately 80%. BDNF rs6265 was in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium among healthy participants (p = 0.64). No significant relationship was revealed between rs6265 and MS [log-additive OR = 0.83 (0.57,1.21), over-dominant OR = 0.73 (0.48,1.14), recessive OR = 1.24 (0.37,4.12), dominant OR = 0.77 (0.50,1.17), co-dominant OR1 = 0.74 (0.48,1.14) and co-dominant OR2 = 1.13 (0.34,3.80)]. Additionally, rs6265 was unrelated to the age of MS onset according to both unadjusted and sex-adjusted cox-proportional models. Finally, rs6265 was not associated with the presence of spinal lesions (cervical or thoracic) at MS onset, according to both unadjusted and age and sex-adjusted logistic regression models.
conclusionsWe failed to establish an association between BDNF rs6265 and the risk of MS, the age of onset, the presence of spinal lesions, and the clinical manifestations at the onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39690366What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.