ReviewPhysiologia plantarum
Plant nutrition challenges for a sustainable agriculture of the future.
Review in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Foliar Nano-Se/Si Supply on the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Iceberg and Romaine Lettuce Grown in Hydroponics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Selenium biofortification: integrating one health and sustainability.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Review
- Leonardite-derived humic substances enhance phosphorus use efficiency in lettuce through integrated physiological and metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- In vitro evaluation of hyaluronate-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes containing trigonelline for their anti-cancer activity on A2780 ovarian cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing the relationship between women's attitudes toward food waste prevention and their green diets.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Plant nutrition challenges for a sustainable agriculture of the future.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article offers a comprehensive review of sustainable plant nutrition concepts, examining a multitude of cutting-edge techniques that are revolutionizing the modern area. The review copes with the crucial role of biostimulants as products that stimulate plant nutrition processes, including their potential for biofertilization, followed by an exploration of the significance of micronutrients in plant health and growth. We then delve into strategies for enhancing plants' tolerance to mineral nutrient contaminants and the promising realm of biofortification to increase the essential nutrients necessary for human health. Furthermore, this work also provides a concise overview of the burgeoning field of nanotechnologies in fertilization, while the integration of circular economy principles underscores the importance of sustainable resource management. Then, with examined the interrelation between micronutrients. We conclude with the future challenges and opportunities that lie ahead in the pursuit of more sustainable and resilient plant systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.