ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Pharmacogenomic profiling of the South Korean population: Insights and implications for personalized medicine.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomics in Health and Biomedicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Clinical impact of pharmacogenetic risk variants in a large chinese cohort.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Clinician Experiences at the Frontier of Pharmacogenomics and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) pose substantial public health issues, necessitating population-specific characterization due to variations in pharmacogenes. This study delineates the pharmacogenomic (PGx) landscape of the South Korean (SKR) population, focusing on 21 core pharmacogenes. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted on 396 individuals, including 99 healthy volunteers, 95 patients with chronic diseases, 81 with colon cancer, 81 with breast cancer, and 40 with gastric cancer, to identify genotype-specific drug dosing recommendations. Our detailed analysis, utilizing high-throughput genotyping (HTG) of CYP2D6 and comparative data from the 1,000 Genomes Project (1 KG) and the US National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP), revealed significant pharmacogenetic diversity in core pharmacogenes such as CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP4F2, NUDT15, and CYP2D6. Notably, intermediate metabolizer frequencies for CYP2B6 in SKR (3.28%) were comparable to Europeans (5.77%) and East Asians (5.36%) but significantly differed from other global populations (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.