Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39691615›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2024

Enhancing animal breeding through quality control in genomic data - a review.

Jungjae Lee, Jong Hyun Jung, Sang-Hyon Oh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of genomic breeding values and accuracy for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cows using whole-genome SNP chip panels.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jungjae LeeJenomics Jenetics Company, Pyeongtaek 17869, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-8862
Jong Hyun JungJung P&C Institute, Yongin 16950, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-7710
Sang-Hyon OhDivision of Animal Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52725, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9696-9638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput genotyping and sequencing has revolutionized animal breeding by providing access to vast amounts of genomic data to facilitate precise selection for desirable traits. This shift from traditional methods to genomic selection provides dense marker information for predicting genetic variants. However, the success of genomic selection heavily depends on the accuracy and quality of the genomic data. Inaccurate or low-quality data can lead to flawed predictions, compromising breeding programs and reducing genetic gains. Therefore, stringent quality control (QC) measures are essential at every stage of data processing. QC in genomic data involves managing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) quality, assessing call rates, and filtering based on minor allele frequency (MAF) and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). High-quality SNP data is crucial because genotyping errors can bias the estimates of breeding values. Cost-effective low-density genotyping platforms often require imputation to deduce missing genotypes. QC is vital for genomic selection, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and population genetics analyses because it ensures data accuracy and reliability. This paper reviews QC strategies for genomic data and emphasizes their applications in animal breeding programs. By examining various QC tools and methods, this review highlights the importance of data integrity in achieving successful outcomes in genomic selection, GWAS, and population analyses. Furthermore, this review covers the critical role of robust QC measures in enhancing the reliability of genomic predictions and advancing animal breeding practices.

Indexed as

Animal breedingGenome-wide association studiesGenomic selectionQuality controlSingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID39691615
PMCPMC11647403

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.