Evidence mapPaperPMID 39692799Full record

ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2025

Sociodemographics and Digital Health Literacy in Using Wearables for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Cross-Sectional Nationwide Survey in Germany.

Chen-Chia Pan, Karina Karolina De Santis, Saskia Muellmann, Stephanie Hoffmann, Jacob Spallek, Nuria Pedros Barnils, Wolfgang Ahrens, Hajo Zeeb, Benjamin Schüz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chen-Chia PanLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany. pan@leibniz-bips.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-3259
Karina Karolina De SantisLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-6767
Saskia MuellmannLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-8395
Stephanie HoffmannDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU) Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-2831
Jacob SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Brandenburg University of Technology (BTU) Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6312-034X
Nuria Pedros BarnilsLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-3600
Wolfgang AhrensLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-570X
Hajo ZeebLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-242X
Benjamin SchüzLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-498X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable technologies have the potential to support health promotion and disease prevention. However, it remains unclear how the role of social determinants of health (SDoH) and digital determinants of health (DDoH) plays in this context.

objectiveThis study investigates differences in sociodemographic factors and digital health literacy between wearable users and non-users, whether the association with wearable use varies across age groups and its potential mediator.

methodsA cross-sectional nationwide telephone survey was conducted in November 2022 in a panel of adult internet users in Germany. Assessments included self-reported wearable use, sociodemographic factors (sex, age, education, household size and income, and residence region), and digital health literacy (measured with the eHealth Literacy Scale, eHEALS). Associations between wearable use, sociodemographic factors and digital health literacy were analyzed using binomial logistic regression models in the total sample and with age group stratification, with a supplementary mediation analysis examining digital health literacy as a mediator in the relationship between age and wearable use.

resultsOverall, 24% (223/932) of participants (52% male, mean age 55.6 years) reported using wearables for health. Wearable use was lower among participants aged 65 and above, with lower educational attainment, living in 1-2 person households, with below-average household income, and residing in smaller cities or former East Germany. Wearable use prevalence is substantially lower in older age groups (18-40: 36%; 41-64: 26%; 65+:14%). Wearable users reported higher levels of digital health literacy (mean: 30.7, SD = 5) than non-users (mean: 28.3, SD = 6). Stratified analyses indicate that the association between digital health literacy and wearable use varies by age group, with significant positive association observed in older age groups (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.07 in age group 18-40; OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.12 in age group 41-64; OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.19 in age group 65+). Mediation analysis indicated that digital health literacy partially mediates the relationship between age and wearable use (indirect effect: coefficient = -0.0156, 95% CI: -0.0244 to -0.00791, p <.001).

conclusionsThis study indicates sociodemographic disparities in wearable use among the German population and differences in digital health literacy between wearable users and non-users. A generational divide in wearable use was identified, with older adults being less likely to embrace this technology. This was especially true for older adults with lower digital health literacy. Future public health initiatives employing health technologies should take SDoH and DDoH into consideration to ensure effective and equitable impacts.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHealth PromotionWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial Determinants of HealthSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsConsumer BehaviorDigital DivideDigital HealthFitness TrackersHealth LiteracyHealth Technology

Identifiers

PMID39692799
PMCPMC12206174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.