ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Uncovering key genes and molecular mechanisms of dendritic cell dysfunction in Esophageal Cancer: implications for Novel Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dendritic cells play a crucial role in initiating and regulating immune responses, and their dysfunction is strongly associated with esophageal cancer. In this study, we aimed to develop a predictive signature and identify key genes linked to dendritic cell dysfunction in esophageal cancer. Through bioinformatics analysis of gene expression data from the TCGA database, we identified a set of 603 genes significantly associated with dendritic cell function. Further analysis using Cox regression and LASSO regression revealed six genes (GDF15, GPT, KRTAP5-5, MMP12, SLC5A1, and C5orf52) that were strongly correlated with overall survival. The prognostic signature constructed from these genes demonstrated that patients in the high-risk group had poorer survival outcomes compared to those in the low-risk group. Immune infiltration analysis indicated a higher abundance of macrophages in the high-risk group, and correlation studies showed a strong positive association between the risk score and the expression of immune checkpoint markers PD1 and PD-L1. Drug sensitivity analysis suggested that Metformin, Gefitinib, and Lapatinib may be more effective in the low-risk group, while Pyrimethamine, Axitinib, and Rapamycin may be more beneficial for high-risk patients. In summary, we identified a 6-gene signature related to dendritic cell dysfunction that can predict prognosis in esophageal cancer, offering valuable insights for personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.