Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693053›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

CryptoBench: cryptic protein-ligand binding sites dataset and benchmark.

Vít Škrhák, Marian Novotný, Christos P Feidakis, Radoslav Krivák, David Hoksza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. UniPocket: Unified Ligand and Cryptic Pocket Prediction from Protein Language Model Embeddings.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  10. The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vít ŠkrhákDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 118 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0009-0007-0712-0661
Marian NovotnýDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8788-3202
Christos P FeidakisDepartment of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7987-6045
Radoslav KrivákDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 118 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7521-0844
David HokszaDepartment of Software Engineering, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 118 00 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4679-0557

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 23-07349S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationStructure-based methods for detecting protein-ligand binding sites play a crucial role in various domains, from fundamental research to biomedical applications. However, current prediction methodologies often rely on holo (ligand-bound) protein conformations for training and evaluation, overlooking the significance of the apo (ligand-free) states. This oversight is particularly problematic in the case of cryptic binding sites (CBSs) where holo-based assessment yields unrealistic performance expectations.

resultsTo advance the development in this domain, we introduce CryptoBench, a benchmark dataset tailored for training and evaluating novel CBS prediction methodologies. CryptoBench is constructed upon a large collection of apo-holo protein pairs, grouped by UniProtID, clustered by sequence identity, and filtered to contain only structures with substantial structural change in the binding site. CryptoBench comprises 1107 structures with predefined cross-validation splits, making it the most extensive CBS dataset to date. To establish a performance baseline, we measured the predictive power of sequence- and structure-based CBS residue prediction methods using the benchmark. We selected PocketMiner as the state-of-the-art representative of the structure-based methods for CBS detection, and P2Rank, a widely-used structure-based method for general binding site prediction that is not specifically tailored for cryptic sites. For sequence-based approaches, we trained a neural network to classify binding residues using protein language model embeddings. Our sequence-based approach outperformed PocketMiner and P2Rank across key metrics, including area under the curve, area under the precision-recall curve, Matthew's correlation coefficient, and F1 scores. These results provide baseline benchmark results for future CBS and potentially also non-CBS prediction endeavors, leveraging CryptoBench as the foundational platform for further advancements in the field. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The CryptoBench dataset, including the benchmark model, is available on Open Science Framework-https://osf.io/pz4a9/. The code and tutorial are available at the GitHub repository-https://github.com/skrhakv/CryptoBench/.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsSoftwareBenchmarkingBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID39693053
PMCPMC11725321

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.