ArticleJAMA network open2024
GOLD COPD Exacerbation History Categories and Disease Outcomes.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond random variation: Monte Carlo analysis and predictability of COPD exacerbations.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- The high-risk B-to-E transitional phenotype: a prospective multi-centre validation of patient reclassification under the updated GOLD 2026 criteria.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Bidirectional Clinical Interactions among Exacerbations and Comorbidities in COPD: A Narrative Review.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Persistently low blood eosinophils identify a high-risk phenotype in COPD.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Mobile health for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a bibliometric analysis based on integrated databases (2000-2025).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes associated with Shenling Bufei Tongluo Decoction as add-on therapy in stable COPD patients with a frequent-exacerbator phenotype: a retrospective real-world cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Rectifying COPD management: a critical analysis of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease strategy.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- Novel molecular mechanisms of eosinophil-mediated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease induced by bezo[a]pyrene.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Five-Year Survival and Associated Factors in COPD Patients in Colombia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Previous exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD) are associated with future events. For more than a decade, patients at high risk have been defined as individuals with a history of 2 or more moderate ECOPD, 1 or more severe ECOPD, or both within 12 months, and treatments have been allocated accordingly, but these cutoffs lack validation. Objectives: To validate ECOPD history categories by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and explore alternative cutoffs to estimate moderate and severe ECOPD and all-cause mortality in COPD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed data from patients with COPD in the German COPD and Systemic Consequences-Comorbidities Network (COSYCONET) study. Patients were recruited from September 2010 to December 2013. Analyses were conducted in September 2023 to August 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of moderate and severe (ie, with hospitalization) ECOPD and all-cause mortality over a 4.5-year follow-up period were assessed using binomial logistic regressions and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) with 95% CIs. Results: Among 2291 patients with COPD GOLD categories 1 to 4 (mean [SD] age, 65 [8] years; 1396 male [60.9%]), the mean (SD) estimated forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration was 52.5% (18.6%). ECOPD history categories by GOLD had an AUROC of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.60-0.65) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58-0.66) to estimate moderate and severe ECOPD, respectively. A single previous moderate ECOPD within 12 months more accurately estimated future moderate and severe ECOPD (AUROC, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.69), and in line with GOLD, 1 previous severe ECOPD within 12 months estimated moderate and severe ECOPD (AUROC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67). The 4-year mortality rate was 219 patients (9.6%). Patients with 3 or more previous moderate ECOPD (odds ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.27-3.72) or 1 or more previous severe ECOPD (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.29-1.91) within 12 months were more likely to die compared with patients without prior ECOPD. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest a limited estimative performance of ECOPD history categories by GOLD. Novel cutoffs were suggested, categorizing patients as without exacerbations or with high-risk exacerbations based on a history of 1 or more moderate ECOPD, 1 or more severe ECOPD, or both within 12 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.