ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
A Deep Learning Network for Accurate Retinal Multidisease Diagnosis Using Multiview Fusion of En Face and B-Scan Images: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of early-stage cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome on retinal structure and function evaluated by optical coherence tomography angiography.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance and generalizability of deep learning for multiple retinal diseases using bimodal imaging of fundus photography and optical coherence tomography.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate diagnosis of retinal disease based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) requires scrutiny of both B-scan and en face images. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of fusing en face and B-scan images for better diagnostic performance of deep learning models. Methods: A multiview fusion network (MVFN) with a decision fusion module to integrate fast-axis and slow-axis B-scans and en face information was proposed and compared with five state-of-the-art methods: a model using B-scans, a model using en face imaging, a model using three-dimensional volume, and two other relevant methods. They were evaluated using the OCTA-500 public dataset and a private multicenter dataset with 2330 cases; cases from the first center were used for training and cases from the second center were used for external validation. Performance was assessed by averaged area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Results: In the private external test set, our MVFN achieved the highest AUC of 0.994, significantly outperforming the other models (P < 0.01). Similarly, for the OCTA-500 public dataset, our proposed method also outperformed the other methods with the highest AUC of 0.976, further demonstrating its effectiveness. Typical cases were demonstrated using activation heatmaps to illustrate the synergy of combining en face and B-scan images. Conclusions: The fusion of en face and B-scan information is an effective strategy for improving the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models. Translational Relevance: Multiview fusion models combining B-scan and en face images demonstrate great potential in improving AI performance for retina disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.