Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39693277›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Risk assessment of pesticide residues ingestion in food offered by institutional restaurant menus.

Thuany Matias da Silva, Larissa Mont'Alverne Jucá Seabra, Luciléia Granhen Tavares Colares, Barbara Lettyccya Pereira Chacon de Araújo, Vanessa Cristina da Costa Pires, Priscilla Moura Rolim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thuany Matias da SilvaDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Larissa Mont'Alverne Jucá SeabraDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Luciléia Granhen Tavares ColaresDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Barbara Lettyccya Pereira Chacon de AraújoDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Vanessa Cristina da Costa PiresDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Priscilla Moura RolimDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-5744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chronic ingestion of pesticide residues through food appears to be a global public health issue, especially in Brazil. This study evaluates 120 menus across six Brazilian institutional restaurants, estimating the allowance of active pesticide ingredients, residue characterization, and chronic exposure risk through food. Data analysis reveals 263 authorized active ingredients, predominantly insecticides (43%), fungicides (40%), and herbicides (14%) for use in 40 foods. Notably, 4% of residues are extremely toxic, 5% highly toxic, and 14% moderately toxic. Forty-two compounds, especially those permitted in animal-source foods, exhibit high bioaccumulation potential. Some foods harbor multiple pesticide residues, raising concerns, despite 99% of residues falling within the Acceptable Daily Intake. Methomyl insecticide poses potential ingestion risks during lunch, warranting attention. The pervasive presence of pesticide residues in daily consumed foods underscores the necessity for greater attention to the source of the food, ensuring access to healthy and safe collective consumption.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationPesticide ResiduesRestaurantsBrazilEatingHumansRisk AssessmentPesticide Residues

Identifiers

PMID39693277
PMCPMC11654986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.