ArticleClinical proteomics2024
Combined urine proteomics and metabolomics analysis for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Potential urine NMR Metabolomic signatures for early diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metabolic Changes in Zebrafish Larvae Infected withMetabolites · 2025Article
- Animal models in tuberculosis metabolomics: a systematic review of current evidence and the road to translational relevance.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) diagnostic monitoring is paramount to clinical decision-making and the host biomarkers appears to play a significant role. The currently available diagnostic technology for TB detection is inadequate. In the present study, we aimed to identify biomarkers for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) using urinary metabolomic and proteomic analysis.
methodsIn the study, urine from 40 PTB, 40 lung cancer (LCA), 40 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients and 40 healthy controls (HC) was collected. Biomarker panels were selected based on random forest (RF) analysis.
resultsA total of 3,868 proteins and 1,272 annotated metabolic features were detected using pairwise comparisons. Using AUC ≥ 0.80 as a cutoff value, we picked up five protein biomarkers for PTB diagnosis. The five-protein panel yielded an AUC for PTB/HC, PTB/CAP and PTB/LCA of 0.9840, 0.9680 and 0.9310, respectively. Additionally, five metabolism biomarkers were selected for differential diagnosis purpose. By employment of the five-metabolism panel, we could differentiate PTB/HC at an AUC of 0.9940, PTB/CAP of 0.8920, and PTB/LCA of 0.8570.
conclusionOur data demonstrate that metabolomic and proteomic analysis can identify a novel urine biomarker panel to diagnose PTB with high sensitivity and specificity. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that it is possible to perform non-invasive clinical diagnoses of PTB through these urine biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.