ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024
Association between glottis screen location and intubation difficulty: a retrospective video laryngoscopy study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Factors in Airway Management: Designing Systems for Safer, Team-Based Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Performance of machine learning models in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in the emergency department: a single-centre retrospective study comparing with conventional regression method.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn emergency settings, difficult intubations often occur unexpectedly despite pre-intubation assessments. Traditional glottic view scoring systems for direct laryngoscope may not apply to video laryngoscopy. With video laryngoscopy, the vertical location of the glottis on the monitor can be clearly defined. If the glottis location is associated with intubation difficulty, it could serve as a simple indicator for anticipating intubation challenges. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the glottis screen location during video laryngoscopy-guided intubation and the success and timing of the first-attempt intubation.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed laryngoscopy recordings from adult intubations in the emergency department of a tertiary teaching hospital in Chiayi, Taiwan, using the C-MAC video laryngoscope between March 2020 and April 2023. The vertical screen location of the vocal cords, determined by the arytenoid cartilage position after laryngeal blade engagement, was categorized into upper and lower locations for analysis. The primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success within 90 s, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis.
resultsAmong 209 laryngoscopy records, 113 had the arytenoid in the lower field of view and 96 in the upper field. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower cumulative success rate for intubations with a higher arytenoid location (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox models, adjusted for factors like modified Cormack-Lehane grade, blade tip engagement, and other intubation findings, confirmed the arytenoid's location as an independent predictor of successful intubation within 90 s, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.79) for the upper location group compared to the lower (P < 0.001).
conclusionsA higher screen location of the vocal cords after blade engagement is associated with reduced first-attempt intubation success. Assessing glottis location during video laryngoscopy intubation provides a quick method to anticipate intubation challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.