Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695430›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024

Risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion in critically ill patients undergoing endoscopy for percutaneous gastrostomy: a case-control study.

Piotr F Czempik, Karolina Buś, Karina Dzięcioł, Mikołaj Gołda, Jan Osicki, Piotr Wosiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piotr F CzempikDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, Katowice, 40-752, Poland. pczempik@sum.edu.pl.
Karolina BuśStudents' Scientific Society, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, Katowice, 40-752, Poland.
Karina DzięciołStudents' Scientific Society, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, Katowice, 40-752, Poland.
Mikołaj GołdaStudents' Scientific Society, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, Katowice, 40-752, Poland.
Jan OsickiStudents' Scientific Society, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, Katowice, 40-752, Poland.
Piotr WosiewiczDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 14, Katowice, 40-752, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacologic prophylaxis for gastric ulcer is commonly prescribed in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of the study was to assess the current prevalence and risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion in ICU patients receiving standard pharmacologic prophylaxis undergoing endoscopy for percutaneous gastrostomy implantation.

methodsPatients hospitalized in the mixed medical-surgical ICU undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were analyzed. We excluded patients receiving either no or high doses of intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI), only patients receiving standard doses of PPI were included. Data retrieved from the electronic medical records included: demographics, risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion (use of stimulants, comorbidities, medications, treatment methods in the ICU, laboratory derangements) and endoscopic findings. The study compared a group of patients with gastric mucosa lesions (cases) vs. patients without gastric mucosa lesions (controls). Inter-group comparisons between cases and controls were performed. Depending on the type of distribution continuous variables were assessed using two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test, whereas categorical variables with Chi-squared or Fisher exact test. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05.

resultsPatients with no prophylaxis (n = 8) or receiving high doses (> 40 mg per day) of proton pump inhibitor (n = 2) were excluded. There were 182 patients receiving standard intravenous dose of PPI, 63 (34.6%) women and 119 (65.4%) men, with median age 61.5 (interquartile range IQR 46.0-70.0) years. Majority of patients (n = 169, 92.9%) were receiving pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. There were 53 (29.1%) patients with gastric mucosa lesion. The only risk factor that was significantly different between cases and controls was history of gastric ulcer (p = 0.04) with OR 3.8 (95% CI 1.1-12.5; p = 0.03).

conclusionsMajority of various risk factors for gastric ulceration may not predict gastric mucosa lesion in ICU patients receiving standard pharmacological prophylaxis undergoing endoscopy for PEG implantation. We found that history of gastric ulcer may be a risk factor for gastric ulceration in the ICU patients. Patients with history of gastric ulcer might benefit from higher than standard doses of anti-ulcer medication when hospitalized in the ICU.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessGastric MucosaGastrostomyProton Pump InhibitorsStomach UlcerAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGastroscopyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsProton Pump InhibitorsCase-control studyEndoscopyGastrostomyIntensive care unitProton pump inhibitorRisk factorUlcer

Identifiers

PMID39695430
PMCPMC11658239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.