Observational studyBMC public health2024
Possible impact of antioxidant intake on composite dietary antioxidant index and the progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aim to evaluate the association of composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in a large population in the United States using a cross-sectional design.
methodsData was retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2008 and 2013-2020 datasets. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to explore the association between CDAI and BPH. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was also conducted to investigate the potential linear relationship. Sub-group analyses were also conducted.
resultsTotally, this study included 13,419 participants with 1085 BPH patients among them. The higher continuous CDAI value was significantly related to higher BPH risk (OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.08). Besides, individuals with the highest quartile (Q4) CDAI possessed 1.87 times risk of BPH than the lowest quartile (Q1, OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.41, 2.50). The RCS curve also showed a positive linear dose-response relationship between CDAI and BPH (cut-off = -0.64). The P for interaction in any subgroup was > 0.05, indicating that the main outcome was not affected by other covariates. The limitation of this study was the lack of data on the relationship between CDAI and the severity of BPH symptoms.
conclusionsThis study reveals that an elevated CDAI may be associated with a linear higher risk of BPH. We do not recommend intentional or excessive antioxidant diet to prevent BPH based on the current results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.