ArticleRespiratory research2024
Diagnostic and prognostic implications of family history of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Genetic Landscape of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: Clinical Implications and Diagnostic Challenges in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Familial interstitial lung disease: emerging insights into screening and genetic risk.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Antifibrotic therapy in familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a comparative cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with familial fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) experience worse survival than patients with sporadic disease. Current guidelines do not consider family aggregation or genetic information in the diagnostic algorithm for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or other fibrotic ILDs. Better characterizing familial cases could help in diagnostic and treatment decision-making.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 222 patients with fibrotic ILD (104 familial and 118 sporadic) from Bellvitge University Hospital. Clinical, radiological, pulmonary functional tests (PFT), and histological evaluations were performed at diagnosis and follow-up. Telomere shortening and disease-associated variants (DAVs) in telomerase-related genes were analysed in familial patients and sporadic patients with telomeric clinical signs. Primary outcomes were the presence of a UIP histological pattern and disease progression.
resultsPatients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (52%), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (23%), and other fibrotic ILDs (25%) were included. 42% of patients underwent lung biopsy. Patients with family aggregation were younger and less frequently associated comorbidities, male sex, and smoking history. However, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was more frequent on pathology (p = 0.005; OR 3.37), especially in patients with indeterminate or non-UIP radiological patterns. Despite similar PFT results at diagnosis, familial patients were more likely to present with progressive disease (p = 0.001; OR 3.75). Carrying a DAV increased the risk of fibrotic progression in familial and sporadic patients (p = 0.029, OR 5.01). DISCUSSION: Familial patients diagnosed with different fibrotic ILDs were more likely to exhibit a histological UIP pattern and disease progression than sporadic patients, independent of radiological findings and pulmonary function at diagnosis.
conclusionConsidering the diagnostic likelihood of the histological UIP pattern and disease outcome, the presence of family aggregation would be useful in the decision making of multidisciplinary committees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.