ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Development and evaluation of a shared decision-making system for choosing the type of bariatric surgery.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sleeve Gastrectomy With Proximal Jejunal Bypass: Balancing Simplicity and Efficacy in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObesity is a multifactorial disease resulting from various environmental, genetic, and metabolic factors, affecting a large portion of the population. One of the most effective treatments for severe obesity is bariatric surgery. This research aims to develop a shared decision-making system that facilitates the selection of the appropriate type of bariatric surgery.
methodIn this research, we designed and developed a prototype of a shared decision-making system to aid in choosing the type of bariatric surgery through three steps: a) identifying data requirements from a literature review, b) designing interfaces and prototyping, and c) conducting a usability evaluation.
resultsThrough a literature review of articles, books, and interviews with ten selected patients, the necessary clinical data and educational topics were identified and confirmed by nine surgeons. A prototype was developed using the web application "Figma." We also analyzed the prototype using heuristic evaluation; "helping users understand and recover from errors" and "confidentiality" had the highest degrees of problem severity, with scores of 3.3 and 3.5, respectively.
conclusionThe developed prototype demonstrated an acceptable level of usability. This system can facilitate shared decision-making and help structure education for patients seeking bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.