Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695739›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024

Itemized point cost method in human resource cost accounting in medical service projects.

Yingqi Li, Siyuan Liang, Kui Qin, Hongtong Su, Peiyong Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingqi LiHealth Care Operation Management Research Center, Shanghai National Accounting Institute, Shanghai, China.
Siyuan LiangShanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Kui QinShanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongtong SuShanghai National Accounting Institute, Shanghai, China.
Peiyong XiaShanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 499247932@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cost accounting of medical service projects forms the basis for disease cost accounting and DRG (Diagnosis-Related Groups) cost accounting. Among the various costs involved, human resources represent a significant portion and are highly complex, making their accurate accounting a critical and challenging aspect of cost accounting for medical service projects.

methodsThis paper introduces the itemized point cost (IPC) method, a novel cost accounting approach based on the RBRVS (Resource-Based Relative Value Scale) theory. It outlines the core concepts of "points" and "process steps" within the IPC framework and details its application in human cost accounting. An example of impacted tooth extraction in the stomatology department of Hospital A is used to illustrate the IPC method's implementation process.

findingsA comparative analysis with activity-based costing and time-estimation costing methods shows that the IPC method is concise, practical, and operable. It is also aligned with the principles of cost-effectiveness.

conclusionsThe paper proposes strategies to promote the IPC method, including leveraging information technology, enhancing top-level design, and standardizing processes, to improve its adoption and effectiveness in medical cost accounting.

Indexed as

Delicacy managementHuman costItemized point cost methodRBRVS

Identifiers

PMID39695739
PMCPMC11656896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.