ArticleStem cell research & therapy2024
Time-efficient strategies in human iPS cell-derived pancreatic progenitor differentiation and cryopreservation: advancing towards practical applications.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiation of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) helps researchers to study the individual sensibility to drugs. However, differentiation protocols are time-consuming, and not all tissues have been studied. Few works are available regarding pancreatic exocrine differentiation of iPS cells, and little is known on culturing and cryopreserving these cells.
methodsWe differentiated the iPS cells of two pediatric Crohn's disease patients into pancreatic progenitors and exocrine cells, adapting and shortening a protocol for differentiating embryonic stem cells. We analyzed the expression of key genes and proteins of the differentiation process by qPCR and immunofluorescence, respectively. We explored the possibility of keeping differentiated cells in culture and freezing and thawing them to shorten the time needed for the differentiation. We analyzed the cell cycle of undifferentiated and differentiated cells by flow cytometry.
resultsThe analysis of mRNA levels of key pancreatic differentiation genes PDX1 and pancreatic amylase indicate that iPS cells were successfully differentiated into pancreatic exocrine cells with expression of PDX1 (one way ANOVA p < 0.0001), and the two isoforms of amylase (one way ANOVA p < 0.05) significantly higher in exocrine cells in comparison to iPS cells. Differentiation efficiency was also confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis of PDX1 and amylase. We confirmed the possibility of shortening the time necessary for obtaining pancreatic cells without losing differentiation efficiency. Pancreatic progenitors and exocrine cells were maintained in culture and cryopreserved. Interestingly, the stemness marker OCT4 resulted significantly lower after subculturing (OCT4 p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA) and after freezing and thawing procedures (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA) suggesting a reduction of undifferentiated stem cells leading to a purer population of pancreatic progenitor cells. Also, the stemness marker NANOG resulted lower after passaging, corroborating this result.
conclusionsIn this work, we optimized the generation of patient-specific pancreatic differentiated cells and laid the foundation for creating a bank of patient-specific pancreatic lines exploitable for tailored pharmacological assays.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, with approval number 1556 (internal ID RC 44/22).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.