Evidence mapPaperPMID 39695848Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2024

Temporal, spatial and demographic distributions characteristics of COVID-19 symptom clusters from chinese medicine perspective: a systematic cross-sectional study in China from 2019 to 2023.

Bin Liu, Tian Song, Mingzhi Hu, Zhaoyuan Gong, Qianzi Che, Jing Guo, Lin Chen, Haili Zhang, Huizhi Li, Ning Liang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bin Liu *Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Tian Song *Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Mingzhi Hu *Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Zhaoyuan GongInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Qianzi CheInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Jing GuoInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Lin ChenInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Haili ZhangInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Huizhi LiInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Ning LiangInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Jing WanCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Kunfeng WangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yanping WangInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. wangyanping4816@163.com.
Nannan ShiInstitute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. 13811839164@vip.126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0278-1608
Luqi HuangChina Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. huangluqi01@126.com.

Funding

2022 Qi Huang Young Scholar programme of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Z08412022 Qi Huang Young Scholar programme of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Z08652023 Agency/National Special Fund Project of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine F0212China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences key collaborative project of Innovation Fund No.CI2022C004-01National Key R&D Program of China NO. 2023YFC3503400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe subtypes diagnosis of disease symptom clusters, grounded in the theory of "Treatment in Accordance with Three Categories of Etiologic Factors" and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11), is a vital strategy for Chinese Medicine (CM) in treating unknown respiratory infectious diseases. However, the classification of disease symptom clusters continues to depend on empirical observations and lacks robust scientific evidence. Consequently, this study seeks to explore the temporal, spatial and demographic distributions characteristics of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptom clusters in China.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, Science direct, WHO, Litcovid, CNKI databases were searched from inception until December 31, 2023. Optical character recognition technology and image recognition technology were employed to identify tables within the papers. Four researchers independently screened and extracted data, resolving conflicts through discussion. Heat mapping and hierarchical clustering techniques were utilized to analyze COVID-19 symptom clusters. Data analysis and visualization were conducted using R software (4.2.0), while the association analysis of symptom clusters was performed using Cytoscape (3.10.2).

resultsA total of 366 COVID-19 clinical trials with 86,972 cases including 66 clinical symptoms of 7 disease systems and other clinical manifestations in China were included. In temporal distribution, 63 symptoms centered around fatigue and 44 symptoms focused on chest tightness are characteristic of symptom clusters in spring and winter, respectively. With the addition of spatial distribution, the symptom clusters in middle and low latitudes during spring are characterized by 53 symptoms centered around fatigue and cough, and 51 symptoms focused on fatigue, respectively. During winter, the symptom clusters in middle and low latitudes are characterized by 38 symptoms centered around chest tightness and 37 symptoms focused on fever, respectively. When considering demographic distribution, the symptom clusters for < 50 years are characterized by fatigue as the core symptom in middle (44 symptoms)/low (28 symptoms) latitudes during spring and middle latitude (25 symptoms) during winter. For ≥ 50 years, the symptom clusters in middle latitude (49 symptoms) during spring and low latitudes (35 symptoms) during winter are centered around cough, while in low latitude (27 symptoms) focuses on diarrhea during spring, and middle latitude (35 symptoms) emphasizes both diarrhea and chest tightness during winter.

conclusionIn summary, variations in symptom clusters and core symptoms of COVID-19 in temporal, spatial and demographic distributions in China offer a scientific rationale for the "Treatment in Accordance with Three Categories of Etiologic Factors" theory. These interesting findings prompt further investigation into CM patterns in the ICD-11, and suggest potential strategies for personalized precision treatment of COVID-19. High-quality clinical studies focusing on individual symptoms are warranted to enhance understanding of respiratory infectious diseases.

Indexed as

Chinese medicineCOVID-19Subtypes diagnosisSymptom clusterTreatment in accordance with three categories of etiologic factors

Identifiers

PMID39695848
PMCPMC11654152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.