Evidence mapPaperPMID 39695995Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024

Audit of preparedness of selected military hospital in the face of biological threats: action research study.

Ali Mohammdi Sehdeh, Abbas Ebadi, Abdollah Saghafi, Alireza Basiri, Esmail Heidaranlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali Mohammdi SehdehTrauma Research Center, Nursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abbas EbadiNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdollah SaghafiNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza BasiriHealth Research Center, Baqiyatullah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Esmail HeidaranluNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Eheidaranlu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn today's societies, the threats caused by chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear accidents, whether accidental or intentional, have become a great concern. Acquiring knowledge about how to respond to the management of these incidents and the complications caused by them in order to preserve societies and ensure stability is essential. Due to the fact that hospitals play an important role in dealing with the victims of biological threats, this study was conducted with the aim of auditing the preparedness of selected military Hospital in facing biological threats in 2023-2024.

methodsThis applied research was conducted with the participatory action research method in all departments of selected military Hospital during one year from July 2023 to July 2024. The level of biological preparedness of the hospital was investigated using the hospital's preparedness tool in biological events with 147 items in 8 main dimensions and 20 sub-dimensions, and the weak areas of the hospital (9 areas) were identified. Then, in the hospital audit cycle, using the FOCUS-PDCA model, a program to improve work processes and improve the biological preparedness of different departments of the hospital in the face of accidents and disasters was implemented. The level of biological preparedness of the hospital before and after the implementation of the change was compared and analyzed using SPSS. version 22 software.

resultsThe preparedness in the studied hospital in facing biological threats before the change was 196 out of 294 and the hospital's biological preparedness percentage was 66.66%, which was in the average range, and after the change, the preparedness score reached 228 and the hospital's preparedness percentage was 77.55%, which was in the range Well classified. In 9 fields where the level of biological preparedness was moderate and weak, the highest preparedness was created in the field of employees and volunteers with 86.36% and the lowest preparedness was related to the field of corpse management with 50%.

conclusionConsidering the impact of training in improving the hospital's preparedness program in the face of biological threats, it is suggested that other medical centers include audits in their work plan.

Indexed as

Action researchAuditBiological threatsHospital

Identifiers

PMID39695995
PMCPMC11654130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.