ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Characteristics of positive and negative effects on the quality of life of breast cancer patients.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of positive psychological intervention on psychosocial adjustment in childbearing-age patients with breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Association of Mood or Affect With Respiratory-Related Quality of Life, Lung Function, and All-Cause Mortality in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative and ongoing treatment of breast cancer is traumatic to women with breast cancer and may lead to positive and negative psychological diseases, which can affect the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) significantly impact the prognosis of postoperative breast cancer patients. However, the effects of specific emotions on patient prognosis and the relationships between them are still unclear.
methodsA case-control study was conducted to investigate the characteristics of PA and NA and their effects on Quality of Life (QoL) in breast cancer patients. 442 postoperative breast cancer patients and 444 healthy women were recruited from November to December 2021. For the observation group, participants were eligible if they (1) were aged between 16 and 80 years and (2) had a confirmed pathological diagnosis of breast cancer and (3) possessed the ability to read text, voluntarily agreed to participate, provided informed consent, and cooperated with the study procedures. The control group consisted of individuals without breast cancer who met all other criteria, as stated above. Patients were excluded from the study if they (1) had severe comorbid conditions causing functional impairment or life-threatening risks or (2) suffered from mental disorders or were unconscious at the time of the study. For the control group, individuals with a pathological diagnosis of breast cancer were also excluded. All other exclusion criteria were consistent with those for the observation group. The demographic information and clinicopathological information of the participants were collected. The Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) is a scale containing 20 emotional scores related to emotion and is used to assess the level of positive and negative affect. The Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients in 15 domains. SPSS 24.0 was used to analyze and process the data. Independent-sample t-tests, one-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis, were used to analyze PA and NA in different treatment phases. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis were conducted to assess the relationships among PA, NA, and QoL. The results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
resultsCompared with healthy women, breast cancer patients had lower scores on "alert" and "distressed" but higher scores on "inspired," "scared," and "afraid." There were no significant differences in the relationships between PA and NA between patients and healthy women (P > 0.05). During the initial treatment phase, the highest proportion of patients had an NA greater than the PA (PA < NA). In the rehabilitation phase, the highest proportion of patients had PA greater than or equal to the NA (PA ≥ NA). The relationship between PA and QoL was an inverted U-shaped curve (P < 0.05), whereas the relationship between NA and QoL was a positive U-shaped curve (P < 0.05). There was an interaction effect between PA and NA (P < 0.001). The relationships among PA, NA, and QoL varied across treatment phases. In the initial treatment phase, the presence of both positive and negative affect improved QoL. In the endocrine therapy phase, excessive positive effects decrease QoL. During the rehabilitation phase, QoL improved as positive affect increased relative to negative affect.
conclusionThere are significant differences in the distributions of positive and negative effects in breast cancer patients at different treatment phases. The impact of PA and NA on QoL varies by treatment phase. Our findings have important implications for tailoring emotional interventions for breast cancer patients at different stages of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.