Evidence mapPaperPMID 39696300Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2024

The double life of glucose metabolism: brain health, glycemic homeostasis, and your patients with type 2 diabetes.

Stanley S Schwartz, Mary E Herman, May Thet Hmu Tun, Eugenio Barone, D Allan Butterfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Linking the exposome to the brain-behaviour phenotype.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stanley S SchwartzUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 771 County Line Road, Villanova, PA, 19085, USA.
Mary E HermanSocial Alchemy: Building Physician Competency Across the Globe, 5 Ave Sur #36, Antigua, Sacatepéquez, Guatemala. mariaon4@mail.com.
May Thet Hmu TunMaimonides Medical Center, 4802 10th Ave, Brooklyn, NY, 11219, USA.
Eugenio BaroneSapienza University of Rome, Via Degli Equi 42, Scala A, Int. 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
D Allan ButterfieldSanders-Brown Center On Aging, Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, 249 Chemistry-Physics Building, Lexington, KY, 40506-0055, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maintenance of cognitive function is essential for quality of life and health outcomes in later years. Cognitive impairment, however, remains an undervalued long-term complication of type 2 diabetes by patients and providers alike. The burden of sustained hyperglycemia includes not only cognitive deficits but also the onset and progression of dementia-related conditions, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent research has shown that the brain maintains an independent glucose "microsystem"-evolved to ensure the availability of fuel for brain neurons without interruption by transient hypoglycemia. When this milieu is perturbed, brain hyperglycemia, brain glucotoxicity, and brain insulin resistance can ensue and interfere with insulin signaling, a key pathway to cognitive function and neuronal integrity. This newly understood brain homeostatic system operates semi-autonomously from the systemic glucoregulatory apparatus. Large-scale clinical studies have shown that systemic dysglycemia is also strongly associated with poorer cognitive outcomes, which can be mitigated through appropriate clinical management of plasma glucose levels. Moreover, these studies demonstrated that glucose-lowering agents are not equally effective at preventing cognitive dysfunction. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor analogs and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) appear to afford the greatest protection; metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) also significantly improved cognitive outcomes. Sulfonylureas (SUs) and exogenous insulin, on the other hand, do not provide the same protection and may actually worsen cognitive outcomes. In the creation of a treatment plan, comorbid cognitive conditions should be considered. These efficacious treatments create a new gold standard of managing hyperglycemia-one which is consistent with the "complication-centric prescribing" mandates issued in type 2 diabetes treatment guidelines. The increasing longevity enjoyed by our populace places the onus on clinical care to play the "long game" in using targeted treatments for glucose control in patients with, or at risk for, cognitive decline to maintain cognitive wellness later in life. This article reviews critical emerging data for scientists and trialists and translates new enhancements in patient care for practitioners.

Indexed as

BrainDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HomeostasisBlood GlucoseGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsAgents, Brain insulin resistanceBrain glucotoxicityCognitive impairmentInjectableInsulin, Noninsulin oralType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39696300
PMCPMC11657227

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.