Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696468›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Lay health coaching intervention for older adults with chronic diseases: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Edwin K H Chung, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong, Hera Hiu-Wah Leung, Dannii Y Yeung, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Frank Youhua Chen

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edwin K H ChungDepartment of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-6419
Eliza Lai-Yi WongThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong. lywong@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-6219
Hera Hiu-Wah LeungDepartment of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-5660
Dannii Y YeungDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-0328
Eng-Kiong YeohThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-9450
Frank Youhua ChenDepartment of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. youhchen@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-9361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large proportion of older adults suffer from chronic diseases. Health coaching is a promising intervention that enhances individuals' health knowledge and supports changes in health behaviours. Even though health professionals usually conduct health coaching interventions, lay health workers from different backgrounds account for a growing segment of health coaches over the years. The planned study's main objective is to investigate whether health coaching by lay health workers is as effective as that by health professionals.

methodsThe effects of health coaching intervention by lay health workers will be examined in comparison with that by health professionals within a single-blind, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up assessment after 3 months. A total of 380 community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases will be recruited and randomly assigned using a 1:1 ratio into the intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive a 3-month health coaching intervention delivered by lay health workers, whereas the control group will receive the intervention delivered by health professionals. Primary outcomes include patient activation, physical activity and nutrition behaviours. DISCUSSION: The expected findings of this study will advance the health coaching literature, research and practice by determining whether health coaching by lay health workers is as effective as that by health professionals in enhancing older adults' knowledge, skills and confidence in chronic disease self-management and promoting changes in health behaviours. If proven effective, the inclusion of lay health workers in delivering effective self-management interventions should be advocated to reduce the over-reliance on health professionals in the primary healthcare system.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN73836238 . Registered 8 November 2023.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersMentoringMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicAgedChronic DiseaseExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-ManagementSingle-Blind MethodChronic diseaseHealth coachesPatient activationPragmaticRandomised control trialSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID39696468
PMCPMC11653921

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.