Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697206›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Renal function assessment in older people: comparative analysis of estimation equation with serum creatinine.

Stefania Peruzzo, Silvia Ottaviani, Luca Tagliafico, Mariya Muzyka, Marta Ponzano, Cristina Marelli, Alessio Signori, Alessio Nencioni, Fiammetta Monacelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefania PeruzzoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia OttavianiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Luca TagliaficoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Mariya MuzykaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marta PonzanoDepartment of Health Sciences - Section of Biostatistics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Cristina MarelliDepartment of Health Sciences - Section of Biostatistics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Alessio SignoriDepartment of Health Sciences - Section of Biostatistics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Alessio NencioniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Fiammetta MonacelliDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Age-related changes occurring in the kidney can lead to a reduction in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR); especially in older adults with multimorbidity and/or frailty, an accurate evaluation of kidney function is critical. For the estimation of GFR in patients over 70 years, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) is often used. However, validated equations exist for old-age populations like BIS1 (Berlin Initiative Study 1) and FAS (Full Age Spectrum). Here we aimed to compare the performance of CKD-EPI, MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease), BIS1, and FAS in assessing eGFR in a population of patients over 70, to evaluate which equations show the most accurate performance in our setting. Materials and methods: A total of 499 older adults were consecutively recruited in the Orthogeriatric ward and Oncogeriatrics clinic of IRCCS Polyclinic San Martino in Genoa Italy. eGFR was calculated using CKD-EPI, MDRD, BIS1, and FAS, calculating mean, median, standard deviation, and interquartile range. Bland-Altman graphs were used to evaluate how each equation performs with respect to the others and the concordance of the attribution of the KDIGO CKD stage was performed with Cohen's K constant and chi-squared test. Results: Patients' mean age was 82.6 years (± 7.44), and the mean creatinine value was 0.97 (± 0.71) mg/dl. The mean value of eGFR was 70 mL/min with CKD-EPI (± 20.6) and MDRD (± 25.7), 57 mL/min with BIS1 (± 16.7) and FAS (± 19.0), respectively. BIS1 and FAS estimated lower eGFR values than CKD-EPI and MDRD. As age increases, a steady decrease in filtrate value is observed with BIS1 and FAS. MDRD and CDK-EPI do not show the same trend. The performance of the equations at a fixed eGFR value of 30 mL/min is more linear for BIS1 and FAS compared with CKD-EPI and MDRD. Upon evaluation with chi-square, the attribution of KDIGO stage was statistically different among the various equations. Discussion: An appropriate assessment of renal function is of key clinical relevance to prevent adverse outcomes and risk of drug accumulation in older adults. Our study originally showed that in persons aged more than 70 years old BIS1 is the most accurate formula in calculating eGFR values when only serum creatinine is available.

Indexed as

BIS1chronic kidney diseaseCKD-EPIcreatinineeGFR equationsFASMDRDolder adults

Identifiers

PMID39697206
PMCPMC11652175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.