Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39697454›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2024

Review of plasma exchange and rituximab for prevention of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after a prior graft loss.

Sophie Gharaei, Hashim Abbas, Durga Anil Kanigicherla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie GharaeiManchester Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester M139WL, United Kingdom.
Hashim AbbasDepartment of Renal Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom.
Durga Anil KanigicherlaDepartment of Renal Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom. durga.kanigicherla@mft.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) often recurs after transplantation, leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss. Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of re-recurrence in subsequent grafts. Rituximab and plasma exchange have been used pre-emptively to prevent post-transplant recurrence. However, the efficacy of such preventative measures remains unclear.

aimTo investigate the outcomes of preventative rituximab and plasma exchange for recurrent FSGS in transplant recipients after prior graft loss.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of 11 studies with 32 patients who had experienced prior graft loss due to post-transplant FSGS recurrence and were treated with either pre-emptive plasma exchange alone, rituximab alone, or a combination of both.

resultsOverall, 47% of the 32 patients experienced recurrence despite prophylactic treatment. Re-recurrence was seen in 25% (1/4) with pre-emptive rituximab alone, and 45% recurrence (9/20) with plasma exchange alone. Re-recurrence was noted in 63% with the use of combined plasma exchange and rituximab.

conclusionThere is a paucity of available evidence in the literature to draw clear conclusions on the benefits of pre-emptive measures to prevent FSGS re-recurrence. The small sample sizes and variations in protocols call for larger and controlled studies to serve this patient population at high risk of recurrence and graft loss.

Indexed as

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosisGlomerular diseasePlasma exchangeRituximabTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39697454
PMCPMC11438932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.