ReviewAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Pediatric cardiac interventions: Innovations from India.
Review in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Congenital heart disease in low- and middle-income countries: can India show the way?Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Eptifibatide bolus dose postductal stenting intervention: A single-center experience.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Pediatric cardiac interventions: Innovations from India.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Re; Mantoo, Mohsin Raj; Ramakrishnan, Sivasubramanian - Pediatric cardiac interventions: Innovations from India.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Beyond case reports: Moving toward high-quality, practice-changing, contextual research in congenital heart disease.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Ethical dilemmas in pediatric cardiac interventions:Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Quality of life in children with congenital heart disease: An emerging Indian perspective.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- The grown-up congenital heart disease dilemma in India: A call for urgent reform in adult congenital cardiac care.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
- Congenital cardiac surgery: Innovations from India.Annals of pediatric cardiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India, owing to its population structure, faces an enormous burden of children born with congenital heart disease (CHD). Systematic challenges such as limited public health infrastructure, a shortage of trained specialists, and high out-of-pocket expenditures hinder uniform access to comprehensive CHD care. Despite these limitations, Indian pediatric cardiologists have delivered innovative and often cost-effective solutions to challenging clinical problems. Indigenous devices such as the MyVal transcatheter heart valve, Konar-MF (multifunction) occluder, and Zephyr large-diameter stents are significant achievements in their respective fields. Static balloon dilatation of interatrial septum and balloon-assisted atrial septal defect (ASD) device implantation are prime examples of many innovations that were established by Indians and followed across the world. India also helped consolidate significant interventions in children, such as percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy and interventions for aortoarteritis. Notably, Indian centers have published some of the largest series on transcatheter closure of sinus venosus ASD and ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. Close collaboration with adult coronary interventionalists has facilitated innovations borrowed from coronary chronic total occlusion hardware and techniques to recanalize ductus arteriosus or membranous-type pulmonary atresia. This manuscript discusses some of India's innovative contributions to the field of pediatric cardiac interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.