Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698450›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024

Bibliometric analysis of research trends in agricultural soil organic carbon components from 2000 to 2023.

Guolong Ge, Xuanyi Chen, Hexiao Ma, Xiangqian Zhang, Jingjing Shi, Xiaoxiang Wang, Xiaoqing Zhao, Manxiu Wang, Feng Xian, Zhanyuan Lu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guolong GeSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xuanyi ChenSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Hexiao MaSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xiangqian ZhangInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Jingjing ShiSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xiaoxiang WangSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Xiaoqing ZhaoInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Manxiu WangSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Feng XianSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology Baotou Teachers University, Baotou, China.
Zhanyuan LuSchool of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
Yuchen ChengInner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil organic carbon is a vital component of the soil carbon pool. Investigation of its composition and dynamics is crucial for enhancing carbon sequestration in soils and for stabilizing the global carbon cycle. In recent years, considerable research has focused on the interactions between soil organic carbon components and their responses to varied land use and agricultural practices. However, the mechanism of soil organic carbon sequestration and response characteristics of soil organic carbon components to soil carbon pools are still subject to some debate. To the best of our knowledge, no researchers have used bibliometric analyses to explore the field of soil organic carbon components. This study thus involved the use of bibliometric techniques to identify research hotspots in the study of organic carbon components over the last 23 years and future trends in research development. Specifically, we performed a comprehensive literature review of 607 documents pertaining to organic carbon components using the Web of Science database, covering the period from 2000 to 2023. Employing CiteSpace, we visualized and analyzed the data across national, institutional, disciplinary, and keyword dimensions. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive, systematic, and quantitative analysis of publications pertaining to organic carbon component research. The results indicate that researchers in the United States and China have substantially influenced the study of soil organic carbon components. Since 2000, the United States has pioneered the study of soil organic carbon components, establishing a foundational role in this field of research. Meanwhile, China leads with the largest number of publications and the most diverse research directions in this field. Among the institutions involved in such research, the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences has the highest number of publications. The investigation of soil organic carbon components within agricultural systems is inherently multidisciplinary, with the most comprehensive research being performed within the soil sciences discipline. At present, the focal areas of research on soil organic carbon components predominantly revolve around the impacts of straw return to fields, varying land-use changes, restoration of vegetation, and the reciprocal effects of soil organic carbon components on the restoration of vegetation. The findings of this work highlight the research hotspots within the field of soil organic carbon components and the emerging trends within this field. This work offers novel insights into the dynamics of soil organic carbon components, potentially guiding future studies in this vital field.

Indexed as

bibliometricsCiteSpaceland-use patternsoil organic carbon componentvisualization analysis

Identifiers

PMID39698450
PMCPMC11652143

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.