Evidence mapPaperPMID 39698949Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Sumedh Jayanti, Nadim A Beruni, Juanita N Chui, Danny Deng, Amy Liang, Anita S Chong, Jonathan C Craig, Bethany Foster, Martin Howell, Siah Kim and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sumedh JayantiWestmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.
Nadim A BeruniResident Support Unit, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, Australia.
Juanita N ChuiSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Danny DengSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Amy LiangSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Anita S ChongDepartment of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Jonathan C CraigCochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Bethany FosterDepartment of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Martin HowellSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Siah KimNephrology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Roslyn B MannonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Ruth Sapir-PichhadzeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Multi-Organ Transplant, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Nicole J Scholes-RobertsonSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Alexandra T StraussJohns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Allison JaureSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lori WestDepartments of Pediatrics, Surgery, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Tess E CooperSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Infections and the Stability of Transplantation ToleranceP01AI097113 · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · 2025 to 2025
$2.0M
Mechanistic studies on pregnancy-induced humoral sensitization in organ transplantationR01AI182097 · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · 2025 to 2025
$822k
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI097113NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI182097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSex, as a biological construct, and gender, defined as the cultural attitudes and behaviours attributed by society, may be associated with allograft loss, death, cancer, and rejection. Other factors, such as recipient age and donor sex, may modify the association between sex/gender and post-transplant outcomes.

objectivesWe sought to evaluate the prognostic effects of recipient sex and, separately, gender as independent predictors of graft loss, death, cancer, and allograft rejection following kidney or simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. We aimed to evaluate this prognostic effect by defining the relationship between recipient sex or gender and post-transplantation outcomes identifying reasons for variations between sexes and genders, and then quantifying the magnitude of this relationship. SEARCH

methodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception up to 12 April 2023, through contact with the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Information Specialist, using search terms relevant to this review and no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies were included if sex or gender were the primary exposure and clearly defined. Studies needed to focus on our defined outcomes post-transplantation. Sex was defined as the chromosomal, gonadal, and anatomical characteristics associated with the biological sex, and we used the terms "males" and "females". Gender was defined as the attitudes and behaviours that a given culture associates with a person's biological sex, and we used the terms "men" and "women". DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed the references for eligibility, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Whenever appropriate, we performed random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the mean difference in outcomes. The outcomes of interest included the Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology-Kidney Transplant (SONG-Tx) core outcomes, allograft loss, death, cancer (overall incidence and site-specific) and acute or chronic graft rejection. MAIN

resultsFifty-three studies (2,144,613 patients; range 59 to 407,963) conducted between 1990 and 2023 were included. Sixteen studies were conducted in the Americas, 12 in Europe, 11 in the Western Pacific, four in the Eastern Mediterranean, three in Africa, two in Southeast Asia, and five across multiple regions. All but one study focused on sex rather than gender as the primary exposure of interest. The number identified as male was 54%; 49 studies included kidney transplant recipients, and four studies included SPK transplant recipients. Twenty-four studies included adults and children, 25 studies included only adults, and four studies included only children. Data from 33 studies were included in the meta-analyses. Among these, six studies presented unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) that assessed the effect of recipient sex on kidney allograft loss. The other studies reported risk ratios (RRs) for the pre-defined outcomes. Notably, the decision to restrict the meta-analyses to unadjusted estimates arose from the variation in covariate adjustment methods across studies, lacking a common set of adjusted variables. Only three studies considered the modifying effect of recipient age on graft loss or death, which is likely crucial to evaluating sex differences in post-transplant outcomes. No studies considered the modifying effect of recipient age on cancer incidence or allograft rejection risk. In low certainty evidence, compared with male recipients, being female may make little or no difference in kidney allograft loss post-transplantation (7 studies, 5843 patients: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.12; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is very low to low certainty evidence to suggest there are no differences in kidney and pancreas allograft survival, patient survival, cancer, and acute and chronic allograft rejection between male and female kidney and SPK transplant recipients.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionGraft SurvivalKidney TransplantationAllograftsBiasFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID39698949
PMCPMC11656698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.