ArticleInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
Use of CRP/lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of treatment selection and mortality in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit.
Article in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio and perforation in pediatric appendicitis.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Longitudinal trajectories of hematological indices and serum metalloproteinases-2 and 9 over 1 year after moderate and severe COVID-19.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study primarily aimed to examine the significance of the C-reactive protein to lymphocyte ratio (CLR), a key marker of inflammation, in relation to the disease progression and management of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 464 patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to the ICU between April 1, 2021, and February 1, 2022, were included in the study. Sociodemographic, laboratory, radiological, and clinical data were collected for each patient. The cohort was then divided into two groups-those who survived and those who did not-and analyzed accordingly. Among the patients included in the study, 58.2% were male, and the mean age was 62.39 ± 15.65 years. The mortality rate was 42%. The analysis revealed that the need for high-flow oxygen and mechanical ventilation increased the risk of death by 9.64 times. Furthermore, for each 1-point increase in the SOFA Score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Nutric Score, the risk of death increased by 1.27, 1.18, and 1.40 times, respectively. Intravenous immunoglobulin, administered to a select group of patients, reduced the risk of death by 23.8 times. The optimal threshold value for CLR was identified as 103.05, with values above this increasing the risk of death by 1.84 times. Critically ill patients with CLR values exceeding the identified threshold should receive more intensive monitoring and timely adjustments in treatment. Given that CLR is a simple, accessible, and cost-effective marker, it holds particular value in managing aggressive diseases like COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.