ArticleUrology practice2025
Identification of Factors Affecting the Accrual of Black Males Into Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials in the United States.
Article in Urology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and facilitators to prostate cancer healthcare in Black men in the UK: from diagnosis to survivorship.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBlack males have the highest incidence and mortality rates from prostate cancer of any racial group in the United States, yet are underrepresented in prostate cancer clinical trials.
methodsThe Prostate Health Education Network surveyed its members about experiences regarding prostate cancer clinical trials and explored reasons for lack of participation. Black males residing in the United States with a diagnosis of prostate cancer were eligible to participate.
resultsOf 480 members contacted, 115 (24.0%) completed the survey. Respondents were diverse in age, geography, education, and socioeconomic status, and 58 (50.4%) had a family history of prostate cancer; 12 of 115 (10.4%) had participated in a prostate cancer clinical trial. The most common reasons for nonparticipation (N = 89) included not being asked (55.1%) and a lack of information about risks and benefits (13.5%). No respondents cited lack of trust in the healthcare system based on personal experience, although 2 (2.2%) cited the Tuskegee study. Factors that would influence future decisions around trial participation included whether respondents (N = 99) perceived the treatment or diagnostic option to be effective for themselves (54.5%), to have the potential to advance medical science (45.5%), and to have minimal side effects (44.4%).
conclusionsThis survey of Prostate Health Education Network members found that the principal reason for Black males not participating in prostate cancer clinical trials was that they were not being asked. This highlights an unmet need for stronger collaboration between patients, health professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, and clinical trial investigators to address barriers to Black males enrolling in prostate cancer clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.