ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for differentiation of patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epstein-Barr virus-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma of the liver: clinical features, imaging findings and potential diagnostic clues.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic liver tumors (MLT) are the most common malignant liver lesions, each requiring distinct therapeutic approaches. Accurate differentiation between these malignancies is critical for appropriate treatment planning and prognostication. However, there is limited data on the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS-LI-RADS) in this differentiation.
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the CEUS-LI-RADS in distinguishing between HCC and MLT in an expanded population at risk for both tumors.
methodsBetween June 2017 and January 2022, 108 patients with HCC and 138 patients with MLT who were pathologically diagnosed, where included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CEUS features and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) categories of the lesions, and based on their consensus, we calculated the diagnostic performance, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CEUS-LI-RADS criteria.
resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS category 5 (CEUS-LR-5) for predicting HCC were 49.1% [95% confidence interval (CI)) 39.3-58.9], 97.1% (95% CI 92.7-99.2), and 76%, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for LI-RADS category M (LR-M) for diagnosing MLT were 89.1% (95%CI 82.7-93.8), 72.2% (95%CI 62.8-80.4), and 81.7%, respectively. Based on current LR-M criteria, a small proportion of HCCs were classified as LR-M due to the presence of early cessation (45-60s). In the analysis of the MLT subgroup, we found that the tumor size affects the distribution of LI-RADS (LR) classification in the subgroup (
conclusionsCEUS-LI-RADS demonstrates high specificity in distinguishing HCC from MLT, providing a reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool that can enhance clinical decision-making. These findings are clinically significant as they can improve patient management and treatment outcomes, and they underscore the need for future research to refine and expand the use of CEUS-LI-RADS in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.