Trial report in Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Xianling Qian *From the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-5366-4976
Shiyu Wang *From the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0007-5374-0087
Yali WuFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0005-6650-402X
Xiyin MiaoFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-0419-7168
Yinyin ChenFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-1192-671X
Hongfei LuFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-7786-8500
Rui WangFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0008-0763-4280
Dong WangFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0003-9414-3669
Fang WangFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0007-6662-7614
Shiyu ZhangFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0006-9976-7237
Jiaxin HaoFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0009-0006-5768-0758
Hang JinFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-6810-2527
Mengsu ZengFrom the Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China (X.Q., S.W., Y.W., X.M., Y.C., H.L., H.J., M.Z.); and United Imaging Health Care Group, Shanghai, China (R.W., D.W., F.W., S.Z., J.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-6107-3623
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Purpose To compare the acquisition time, image quality, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) visualization and quantification on phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) images using 5.0-T versus 3.0-T cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods In this prospective crossover study, 49 participants (mean ± SD age, 43.7 years ± 13.1; 39 men) suspected or diagnosed with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled from April 2023 to March 2024 and randomly assigned to group 1 (5.0-T followed by 3.0-T LGE cardiac MRI) or group 2 (3.0-T followed by 5.0-T LGE cardiac MRI). PSIR images were acquired at spatial resolutions of 1.2, 0.9, and 1.6 mm. Image quality and LGE were qualitatively evaluated using a five-point Likert scale by two readers, and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and LGE mass were quantitatively assessed. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate interreader agreement. Results There was no evidence of a difference in the acquisition time for obtaining a single-layer PSIR image at 5.0 T compared with 3.0 T (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.