ArticlePloS one2024
Enhancing the color and stress tolerance of cherry shrimp (Neocaridina davidi var. red) using astaxanthin and Bidens Pilosa.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of astaxanthin and Bidens Pilosa compound feed additives on the color and hypoxia tolerance of cherry shrimp (Neocaridina davidi var. red). Color parameters were assessed using CIELAB color space, and differential gene expression related to color and stress was analyzed using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to understand the gene regulatory mechanisms affecting color expression and stability. Over a 56-day rearing period, the feed additives AX100 (astaxanthin 100 mg/kg) and AX100+BP (astaxanthin 100 mg/kg + B. pilosa 5 g/kg) significantly reduced the color difference values compared to the standard sample (ΔE*ab), indicating notable color boosting effects. This included a reduction in lightness (L*), a decrease in color hue angle (h*) with AX100, and an increase in redness (a*) and chroma (C*) with AX100+BP. We further designed 22 color-related gene primers, 16 of which amplified the target fragment. Six gene sets exhibited significant differences among all feed treatment groups and were correlated with color expression. After 9 hours of hypoxic stress, body color remained stable in the feed additive groups, especially in the AX100 + BP and AX200 + BP (astaxanthin 200 mg/kg + B. pilosa 5 g/kg) groups, with color differences before and after hypoxic stress remaining below the discernible threshold of the human eye, indicating optimal color stability. Additionally, the CAT gene, among the stress-related genes that successfully amplified, showed significant differences among feed treatment groups and correlated with color stability based on color difference values. In conclusion, the composite addition of 100 mg/kg astaxanthin and 5 g/kg Bidens pilosa (AX100 + BP) was identified as the most effective treatment. This formulation significantly enhanced cherry shrimp color, evidenced by improved parameters such as decreased lightness and increased redness. Moreover, AX100 + BP demonstrated superior color stability under hypoxic conditions, with ΔE*ab values remaining below the discernible threshold of the human eye, highlighting its potential for maintaining optimal color during transportation. Offering a basis for enhancing the commercial value and reducing the sale risks of cherry shrimp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.