Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39700146›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Single-cell atlas of

Carolina M C Catta-Preta, Kashinath Ghosh, David L Sacks, Tiago R Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Identification of a conserved gene family with an essential role inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cryptic Sex inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Eprinomectin InhibitsTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolina M C Catta-PretaIntracellular Parasite Biology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0001-8983-3487
Kashinath GhoshIntracellular Parasite Biology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.
David L SacksIntracellular Parasite Biology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-3124
Tiago R FerreiraIntracellular Parasite Biology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0003-4894-1515

Funding

HHS | NIH | NIAID | Division of Intramural Research (DIR, NIAID) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sandfly vectors transmit

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisAnimalsFemaleInsect VectorsLeishmaniaLeishmania majorLeishmaniasisMicePhlebotomusPsychodidaeTranscriptomeinfectionLeishmaniasand flysingle-cell RNA-seqtransmission

Identifiers

PMID39700146
PMCPMC11670217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.