Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39700208›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Allison Gilchrist, Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath Fernando, Paula Holland, Faraz Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison GilchristDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8105-6780
Gunasekara Vidana Mestrige Chamath FernandoDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Paula HollandDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Faraz AhmedDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded public and private health coverage, increased health insurance affordability, reduced healthcare costs, and improved healthcare quality for many. Despite ACA provisions, lack of insurance and other factors continue to affect working-age women's access to primary care services.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-method systematic review to identify factors that affect women's access to primary care services since the ACA. In January 2021, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched from 2010 to 2021 and an updated search was conducted in October 2023. We included 26 quantitative and qualitative studies reporting determinants, barriers and facilitators of women's primary care access for women (18 to 64 years). Studies reporting measures of potential access, such as health insurance, and measures of realized access-healthcare service utilization, were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (2018) was used to rate the quality of studies. Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use guided the narrative synthesis.

findingsWe found consistent evidence that ACA provisions expanding state Medicaid eligibility led to improved insurance coverage, especially for lower-income groups. We found mixed evidence of associations between individual-level determinants, such as age, education, race/ethnicity, income, and different measures of access. Limited qualitative evidence suggests that insurance coverage, low-cost care, positive patient-provider relationships, social support, and translation services enhance access for immigrants and refugees. Barriers include lack of coverage, high healthcare costs, culturally unresponsive healthcare services, poor patient-provider relationships, and transportation issues.

conclusionAdoption of ACA's expanded Medicaid eligibility criteria would expand insurance coverage to women living in non-expansion states. Innovative healthcare policies, programs, and interventions at the federal, state, and local levels are needed. Suggested strategies include interventions expanding primary healthcare service availability and patient navigation services, and promotion of health literacy, culturally sensitive services, and provider bias education/training.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMedicaidMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39700208
PMCPMC11658587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.